Abstract
Social comparison theory has linked improved performance to both the tendency to compare with others who are performing well and the tendency to view the self as better than others. However, little research has investigated the effects of either variable outside of a controlled laboratory environment, Moreover, there is reason to believe that the 2 tendencies would be in opposition to one another, because people who compare upward might subsequently view themselves as relatively less competent. The results of a longitudinal study of 876 students in their Ist year of secondary education indicated that both variables independently predicted improved academic performance and that these 2 tendencies did not conflict.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 420-430 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of personality and social psychology |
Volume | 76 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Mar-1999 |
Keywords
- DEFENSIVE PESSIMISM
- SELF-EFFICACY
- FAILURE
- IMPACT
- THREAT
- DETERMINANTS
- INFORMATION
- ATTRIBUTES
- DIRECTION
- SUCCESS
Handle.net
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Blanton, H., Buunk, BP., Gibbons, FX., & Kuyper, H. (1999). When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(3), 420-430.
Blanton, H ; Buunk, BP ; Gibbons, FX et al. / When better-than-others compare upward : Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. In: Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 420-430.
@article{07efc6eb7459430d882926a62a40242f,
title = "When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance",
abstract = "Social comparison theory has linked improved performance to both the tendency to compare with others who are performing well and the tendency to view the self as better than others. However, little research has investigated the effects of either variable outside of a controlled laboratory environment, Moreover, there is reason to believe that the 2 tendencies would be in opposition to one another, because people who compare upward might subsequently view themselves as relatively less competent. The results of a longitudinal study of 876 students in their Ist year of secondary education indicated that both variables independently predicted improved academic performance and that these 2 tendencies did not conflict.",
keywords = "DEFENSIVE PESSIMISM, SELF-EFFICACY, FAILURE, IMPACT, THREAT, DETERMINANTS, INFORMATION, ATTRIBUTES, DIRECTION, SUCCESS",
author = "H Blanton and BP Buunk and FX Gibbons and H Kuyper",
year = "1999",
month = mar,
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "420--430",
journal = "Journal of personality and social psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "3",
}
Blanton, H, Buunk, BP, Gibbons, FX & Kuyper, H 1999, 'When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance', Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 420-430.
When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. / Blanton, H; Buunk, BP; Gibbons, FX et al.
In: Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 76, No. 3, 03.1999, p. 420-430.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - When better-than-others compare upward
T2 - Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance
AU - Blanton, H
AU - Buunk, BP
AU - Gibbons, FX
AU - Kuyper, H
PY - 1999/3
Y1 - 1999/3
N2 - Social comparison theory has linked improved performance to both the tendency to compare with others who are performing well and the tendency to view the self as better than others. However, little research has investigated the effects of either variable outside of a controlled laboratory environment, Moreover, there is reason to believe that the 2 tendencies would be in opposition to one another, because people who compare upward might subsequently view themselves as relatively less competent. The results of a longitudinal study of 876 students in their Ist year of secondary education indicated that both variables independently predicted improved academic performance and that these 2 tendencies did not conflict.
AB - Social comparison theory has linked improved performance to both the tendency to compare with others who are performing well and the tendency to view the self as better than others. However, little research has investigated the effects of either variable outside of a controlled laboratory environment, Moreover, there is reason to believe that the 2 tendencies would be in opposition to one another, because people who compare upward might subsequently view themselves as relatively less competent. The results of a longitudinal study of 876 students in their Ist year of secondary education indicated that both variables independently predicted improved academic performance and that these 2 tendencies did not conflict.
KW - DEFENSIVE PESSIMISM
KW - SELF-EFFICACY
KW - FAILURE
KW - IMPACT
KW - THREAT
KW - DETERMINANTS
KW - INFORMATION
KW - ATTRIBUTES
KW - DIRECTION
KW - SUCCESS
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 76
SP - 420
EP - 430
JO - Journal of personality and social psychology
JF - Journal of personality and social psychology
IS - 3
ER -
Blanton H, Buunk BP, Gibbons FX, Kuyper H. When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999 Mar;76(3):420-430.